Rework Cost per Part: How to Calculate It, and Why It Is Not Scrap
The formula for rework cost per part, how to tell a part you can save from a part you must throw away, and why merging the two overstates cost every single time.
A part that came out wrong but can still be saved - touched up, rewelded, repainted, remachined - costs real money, but it costs money in a different shape from a part you throw away. This guide shows how to price that, and where the line between the two runs.
Rework and scrap differ on one question
The question is: does that part still get sold in the end?
| Scrap | Rework | |
|---|---|---|
| What happens to the part | Thrown away | Still sold |
| Does a replacement have to be made? | Yes | No |
| Formula | Grossed up by the defect rate - you must make extra to ship enough | Straight multiplication - only the repair effort is added |
| What is lost | Everything already spent on that part | Only the extra labor and materials used in the repair |
Rework
Parts made wrong but SAVEABLE: touch-up, re-welding, repainting, re-machining. Extra effort, but no replacement part is needed.
Enter it when there is a rework step. It is a separate section from Scrap because the two are mathematically different.
The “cost per repair” field takes either shape: a flat amount per repair, or the minutes spent plus a cost per minute. The second is closer to the truth when the repair is mostly a person's time, because then you can time it with a stopwatch instead of estimating it.
Worked example: 2,000 pieces a month, 3% need touching up, each touch-up costs 8,000 -> 2,000 x 0.03 x 8,000 = 480,000 a month. Nothing is grossed up, because those 60 pieces still ship; no replacement is made.
What does not belong here
- Parts scrapped outright - that is the Scrap category, and it has its own gross-up.
- Repair time you already folded into wages under Labor - entering it in both places counts it twice, and nothing warns you.
- The inspection effort that FINDS the defects - that is inspection time, and it belongs under Labor. This category counts only the repair.
- Penalties or customer compensation for late delivery caused by rework - that is a commercial consequence, not a cost of making one part.
Three common mistakes
| Mistake | What it does to the number |
|---|---|
| Folding rework into scrap to keep it simple | Cost comes out higher than it is, and any improvement to the defect rate looks like a bigger saving than it is |
| Folding repair time into Labor | Cost of quality disappears - “cost to make” and “cost to re-make” can no longer be read apart |
| Leaving it blank because “it is only a little” | A blank field is added as zero. For painting or welding this is rarely as small as it feels |
When it is worth separating this out
When you are arguing about whether to tighten incoming quality. Separate “cost to re-make” from “cost to make” and the two options separate themselves; nobody has to win the argument.
And when your improvement aims straight at the defect rate: this is the category where the number will move, and buried inside another one you will not see it move.
Try it on your own numbers, no sign-up: open the cost calculator and pick the Rework category.
Related guides
- The Ten Manufacturing Cost Categories, in Production Order
The ten cost categories Costdown uses to price a product — material, machinery, labor, tooling, scrap, rework, outsourced processing, packaging, logistics, factory overhead — with the formula and a worked example for each.
- How to Fill In the Before and After Cost Tables So the Saving Percentage Comes Out Right
How to enter each line in the current-state and optimized cost tables - item name, standard code, brand, monthly volume, cycle time - so the system computes the saving percentage, ROI and payback correctly.
More in this industry
- How to document a cost reduction project so other people trust it
- Is the saving real? Bottlenecks, and the three ways a number becomes money
- Six fields almost nobody fills in, and which way each one bends the cost
- Packaging Cost per Unit: Price It by Pack Quantity, Not by Weight
- Outsourced Processing Cost: Price per Part, and the Line Against Freight
- Allocating Factory Overhead Into Product Cost Without Counting It Twice
- Manufacturing cost formulas: two formulas, two different questions