Skip to main content

Rework Cost per Part: How to Calculate It, and Why It Is Not Scrap

The formula for rework cost per part, how to tell a part you can save from a part you must throw away, and why merging the two overstates cost every single time.

Updated

A part that came out wrong but can still be saved - touched up, rewelded, repainted, remachined - costs real money, but it costs money in a different shape from a part you throw away. This guide shows how to price that, and where the line between the two runs.

What this guide does not do: tell you what your rework rate ought to be. There is no benchmark for that, and anyone who gives you one without knowing your process is guessing. What follows is how to MEASURE the rate you already have, and how to turn it into money.

Rework and scrap differ on one question

The question is: does that part still get sold in the end?

ScrapRework
What happens to the partThrown awayStill sold
Does a replacement have to be made?YesNo
FormulaGrossed up by the defect rate - you must make extra to ship enoughStraight multiplication - only the repair effort is added
What is lostEverything already spent on that partOnly the extra labor and materials used in the repair
Confusing the two always errs towards OVERSTATING, never the other way: scrap is grossed up and rework is not. At a 50% rate the figure comes out double.

Rework

Parts made wrong but SAVEABLE: touch-up, re-welding, repainting, re-machining. Extra effort, but no replacement part is needed.

Enter it when there is a rework step. It is a separate section from Scrap because the two are mathematically different.

The “cost per repair” field takes either shape: a flat amount per repair, or the minutes spent plus a cost per minute. The second is closer to the truth when the repair is mostly a person's time, because then you can time it with a stopwatch instead of estimating it.

Worked example: 2,000 pieces a month, 3% need touching up, each touch-up costs 8,000 -> 2,000 x 0.03 x 8,000 = 480,000 a month. Nothing is grossed up, because those 60 pieces still ship; no replacement is made.

What does not belong here

  • Parts scrapped outright - that is the Scrap category, and it has its own gross-up.
  • Repair time you already folded into wages under Labor - entering it in both places counts it twice, and nothing warns you.
  • The inspection effort that FINDS the defects - that is inspection time, and it belongs under Labor. This category counts only the repair.
  • Penalties or customer compensation for late delivery caused by rework - that is a commercial consequence, not a cost of making one part.

Three common mistakes

MistakeWhat it does to the number
Folding rework into scrap to keep it simpleCost comes out higher than it is, and any improvement to the defect rate looks like a bigger saving than it is
Folding repair time into LaborCost of quality disappears - “cost to make” and “cost to re-make” can no longer be read apart
Leaving it blank because “it is only a little”A blank field is added as zero. For painting or welding this is rarely as small as it feels

When it is worth separating this out

When you are arguing about whether to tighten incoming quality. Separate “cost to re-make” from “cost to make” and the two options separate themselves; nobody has to win the argument.

And when your improvement aims straight at the defect rate: this is the category where the number will move, and buried inside another one you will not see it move.

Try it on your own numbers, no sign-up: open the cost calculator and pick the Rework category.

Related guides

More in this industry

Rework Cost per Part: How to Calculate It, and Why It Is Not Scrap | costdown.org