Skip to main content

Fisheries cost breakdown: two very different models — capture and aquaculture

Costing fisheries under its two structurally different models — capture fishing costed by fuel per trip, aquaculture costed by feed conversion ratio and stage-based loss, the same principle as livestock.

Updated

Fisheries isn't one industry but two structurally different cost models, and you need to know which one you're in before costing anything: CAPTURE (wild harvest at sea or on rivers) and AQUACULTURE (fully controlled farming). This guide covers both and flags exactly where they diverge.

The costing unit: ONE KILOGRAM OF FISH/SEAFOOD harvested or caught.

Two sequences

Capture: trip preparation (fuel, ice, provisions) - fishing at sea - on-board processing/chilling - landing at port, grading - transport to buyer/processor.

Aquaculture: pond/cage setup - stocking - feeding & monitoring by growth stage - harvest - processing/storage - transport.

Two features unique to this industry

1. Capture: fuel is the largest cost, not material

Under the capture model, the material category barely exists in the usual sense - fish come from the wild, not a supplier. The largest cost shifts to fuel for running the boat, the same way maritime freight costs its trips - get cost per kilogram by dividing a trip's total fuel by that same trip's catch.

Catch varies enormously trip to trip even though fuel burn is nearly fixed by the route - meaning a single trip's cost per kilogram isn't representative. Track it across many trips before drawing a conclusion.

2. Aquaculture: feed conversion ratio + stage-based loss

Under the aquaculture model, the structure resembles livestock closely - feed is costed by conversion ratio (feed per unit of weight gain), and mortality in ponds/cages is tracked separately by growth stage. It differs from land-based livestock in that the underwater environment is hard to observe directly, so loss figures are usually only accurate at scheduled harvests/counts, not day to day.

Everything else

Machinery (fishing vessels - mostly OWNED given the capital involved; aeration/pumping systems for ponds). Labor (crew per trip, or farm staff by shift). Consumables (nets, fishing gear, ice for preservation). Subcontracted work (water quality/disease testing service). Rework (essentially none). Packaging (foam boxes, ice packed for transport). Freight (refrigerated truck/vessel, with a temperature requirement for the whole trip).

Overhead - water surface/farming area lease, similar to land rent in crop farming; for the capture model, port fees and fishing license fees.

Evidence

  • Trip log - fuel consumed, catch per trip.
  • Feeding log and harvest/count log by pond/cage.
  • Water quality/disease test results.
  • Water surface lease or fishing license.

Related guides

What to do next

Now that you have read it, the fastest way to see your own numbers is to type them in. No account, nothing saved.

Run the numbers on your own figures

And if reading this made you realise you have already done it: leave it here, and the next person is spared the road you already walked.

Publish a case
Fisheries cost breakdown: two very different models — capture and aquaculture | costdown.org