Skip to main content

Forestry logging cost breakdown: harvesting rights and the cubic-meter unit

Costing forestry logging the way the industry actually works — no purchased material like mining, harvesting rights or land lease depreciated against standing volume for the cycle, and skidding costed separately by terrain.

Updated

Forestry logging shares one basic trait with mining: there is NO purchased raw material - timber comes directly from the forest, not from a supplier. But it differs from mining in an important way: a forest can regenerate, so the largest one-time cost isn't drilling or excavation - it's the harvesting right or forest land lease for the cycle.

The costing unit: ONE CUBIC METER OF ROUNDWOOD harvested - raw logs before milling, a different unit from the wood-processing stage that follows.

The logging sequence

  1. Volume survey & harvesting permit.
  2. Extraction road opening within the tract.
  3. Felling.
  4. Skidding to the landing.
  5. Bucking & grading to specification.
  6. Loading onto transport.
  7. Transport out of the forest to the log yard/mill.

Two features unique to this industry

1. Harvesting rights/land lease - a large one-time cost, depreciated against standing VOLUME

The cost of a harvesting right or forest land lease for one cycle (from permit to completing that tract) is a very large one-time investment, the same principle as depreciating drilling cost in oil extraction: divide by the tract's TOTAL EXPECTED STANDING VOLUME, not by a fixed number of years - two tracts with the same rights cost but different volume will land on very different cost per cubic meter.

2. Skidding - cost depends on terrain, not a fixed line

Skidding logs from the felling point to the landing carries its own machinery/labor cost, separate from felling, because distance and terrain difficulty vary lot to lot within the same tract - don't apply one flat rate to the whole tract if the terrain isn't uniform.

Blending felling and skidding into one line hides which lot's difficult terrain is dragging up the average cost - keeping them separate is what reveals which lot's extraction method is actually worth improving.

Everything else

Machinery (chainsaws, skidders - mostly OWNED since equipment moves constantly between tracts). Labor (felling crew, skidding crew by shift or piece rate). Loss (off-spec stem sections left behind/rejected - the equivalent of scrap, costed as recovered volume against measured standing volume). Consumables (saw chains, skidding cable). Subcontracted work (volume survey service, specialized extraction service on difficult terrain). Rework (essentially no equivalent). Packaging (not meaningful for raw roundwood).

Freight - the leg from the in-forest landing to the main road is usually a separate and notably higher cost than the leg from the main road to the mill, because forest roads are harder going; cost these two legs separately. Overhead - forest management, fire prevention, and any required provision for replanting/regeneration after harvest.

Evidence

  • Pre-harvest volume survey records.
  • Harvesting permit/forest land lease.
  • Logging log - felled volume, volume skidded to landing by day.
  • Roundwood grading tickets at the landing.

Related guides

What to do next

Now that you have read it, the fastest way to see your own numbers is to type them in. No account, nothing saved.

Run the numbers on your own figures

And if reading this made you realise you have already done it: leave it here, and the next person is spared the road you already walked.

Publish a case
Forestry logging cost breakdown: harvesting rights and the cubic-meter unit | costdown.org